Wednesday, February 11, 2015

Prayer and Bible Reading Begin at Home




Religious expression has been a source of conflict throughout American history. The colony of Rhode Island was established with the primary goal of freedom of religious expression. Thomas Jefferson wrote the defining statement on freedom of religion into the Virginia Statutes before the American Constitution was developed. Questions continue to be raised about the place of religious expression in the public setting.

Of most immediate concern is what are we doing about what we personally believe. Our court system is still addressing issues such as allowing prayer at the beginning of public government meetings whether it be town councils, state legislatures, or congress itself. People still raise the issue of the appropriateness of mentioning God in a public setting in a way that would be considered reverential.

Our Supreme Court issued rulings related to prayer and Bible reading in schools in cases handed down in 1962 and 1963 (Engel v. Vitale and Abingdon School District v. Schempp respectively). In summary these decisions said a public school could not demand a prayer composed by the institution be used by the students or faculty, nor could a sectarian book be required reading as devotional material. From these cases and others that followed, many have said the Supreme Court took the Bible and prayer out of schools.

As long as there are math tests there will be prayer in schools. I use this humorous statement to make the point the Supreme Court did not ban prayer or Bible reading in our public schools. The rulings were clear that religious expression could be banned from schools only if it disrupted the intended purpose of the school which is nonsectarian instruction.

This says students can pray in school all they want as long as it does not disrupt the purpose of the school. Students can read the Bible all they want as long as it does not disrupt the teaching program of the school. Student religious groups have the right to meet on school property as long as it is not during instruction time.

This all leads to my primary point. Most students will not know how to pray or how to study their Bibles in a school setting if they are not learning how in their homes and churches. People who complain about the courts taking the Bible and prayer out of public schools raise my blood pressure when I discover they do not practice regular family devotion periods at home, or they do not provide their children with Bible and devotional material designed for their comprehension level, nor make sure their kids are WITH them in Bible study at church on a regular basis.

In conjunction with this is my growing concern about the time we spend in prayer and Bible reading in our churches. During a year’s time I will be in more than thirty churches on multiple occasions. I find a diversity of worship styles and elements. I also find a lack of focused prayer and extensive Bible reading.

Most prayers in Sunday morning church service last less than 90 seconds. The pastoral prayer will last the longest at three to five minutes. Wednesday night prayer services are generally illness discussions, a brief Bible study, and a prayer time that may last ten minutes.  If most of our people only come to corporate worship services, when are we teaching them to pray?

Bible readings in most of our churches take even less time. The text for the sermon may often be the only biblical passage read. We spend more time singing than we do reading the Bible. It takes more time to take up the offering than it does to read the Bible. Is this how we teach our children the importance of the Bible?

Deu 6:6-7 Never forget these commands that I am giving you today. Teach them to your children. Repeat them when you are at home and when you are away, when you are resting and when you are working.

My patience runs thin when I hear someone complaining about our courts. I want to ask them if they have abdicated their roles as parents to the government. We are truly in a sad situation if we have.