Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Is Peace What We Want?




One of the titles for Jesus we have taken from the Old Testament is “Prince of Peace” (Isaiah 9:6). Jesus describes his work among men as bringing peace in a way that is radically different than anything the world can offer (John 14:27). In Matthew 10:34, however, Jesus describes his ministry as one that will bring, not peace, but a sword. To identify with him is to bring division in family and social relationships where some accept him and others reject him. There can be no peace where there is a division over the calling of Christ.

This matter of peace for Jesus that we see in his teachings and his example can give one serious discomfort. In the Beatitudes (Matthew 5:9) Jesus said that peacemakers were to receive the blessing of being called the children of God. Yet one has to wonder if Jesus hesitated long outside the Temple of Jerusalem before he went in with whip in hand to do some serious housecleaning (John 2:13-17). Jesus guided his actions with a wisdom springing from his sinless walk with his Father that we sinful humanity lack.

In my years of ministry I have come to see two types of peace in congregations. The first is the peace that comes from a strong unity among the members. They are not without stress because they are in the midst of action and change. There is, nonetheless, a peace that comes from the certainty that they are involved in the right actions. They as a church have focused on the right priorities.

The other kind of peace is what I sense as I move through the stones of a cemetery. Many congregations have that kind of peace as well. The membership is united as it travels a path to certain death. There is no conflict because nothing is moving. There is no unrest because every member is content with the status quo. There is no disagreement because all have decided no decisions are necessary except to do nothing. All is peaceful and quiet much like a cemetery.

I don’t believe this is the kind of peace Jesus had in mind for his disciples and his Church. I don’t believe that Jesus ever saw his Church at peace while it bore witness to him in this world. I don’t believe he ever thought it would be free from conflict in its efforts to make disciples of all peoples. I don’t believe he saw his Church resting comfortably upon any kind of past accomplishments. Yet he believed that all of his followers could experience peace as they focused upon him.

A recent article in our state Baptist paper (Biblical Recorder quoting Baptist Press, Nov. 7, 2012, “Calvinism team meets for second time”) offers a brief insight into the current efforts to reach some “peaceful” conclusion regarding Calvinistic doctrine and the Southern Baptist Convention. An informal discussion group is meeting to determine “a strategy whereby people of various theological persuasions can purposely work together in missions and evangelism.”

This group represents an effort by the Southern Baptist Convention Executive Committee President Frank Page to address the increasing number of questions raised about Calvinism and its place in Southern Baptist doctrinal life. Perhaps some state conventions have felt the need to address this issue, but the primary conversation is taking place on the national level.

I raise these issues of peace and Calvinism in the same article because of their example of dynamics within Southern Baptist life. The recently concluded North Carolina Baptist State Convention recorded 1604 messengers and 281 guests (Biblical Recorder, Nov. 14, 2012). This rates as one of the smallest number in my memory. Recent Southern Baptist Convention annual meetings have been able to meet in smaller venues because of decreased attendance. Perhaps these numbers reflect a kind of peace.

We declared all the extreme liberals to be outside cooperating fellowship and told them they were no longer welcome. Then the moderate Baptist churches discovered their voices were no longer required at the annual meetings on the state or national level, so they stopped coming. Now we are being led to believe that a doctrinal issue based upon some form of Calvinism may lead others to see that their chair at the table of denominational fellowship might be removed. Compromise leading to unity has been a difficult goal to reach when it comes to doctrinal issues in Baptist life.

Do we really have to condemn someone and clean house to feel like we are on God’s side and on our way to peace? It just might be that God left the discussion table some time ago.